Maternal prepregnancy BMI (ppBMI) and an infant’s rapid weight gain (RWG) are each associated with increased risk for childhood obesity. We hypothesized that ppBMI and RWG interact to further raise childhood obesity risk.
Mother-infant dyads (n = 414) from the Healthy Start Study, an observational prebirth cohort, were included. RWG was defined as a weight-for-age z score increase of ≥0.67 from birth to 3 to 7 months. Body composition was measured by air displacement plethysmography at age 4 to 7 years. General linear regression models were fit to characterize associations between ppBMI, RWG, and their interaction with the outcomes of childhood BMI-for-age z score and percent fat mass (%FM).
A total of 18.6% (n = 77) of offspring experienced RWG. Maternal ppBMI and RWG were both positively associated with offspring BMI z score and %FM. RWG amplified the association between ppBMI and BMI z score, especially among females. Females exposed to maternal obesity and RWG had an average BMI at the 94th percentile (1.50 increase in childhood BMI z score) compared with those exposed to normal ppBMI and no RWG (average childhood BMI at the 51st percentile). RWG had a weaker effect on the association between ppBMI and %FM. Adjustment for breastfeeding status or childhood daily caloric intake did not significantly alter findings.
Rapid infant weight gain interacts with maternal ppBMI to jointly exacerbate risk of childhood obesity. Pediatric providers should monitor infants for RWG, especially in the context of maternal obesity, to reduce future risk of obesity.
Rapid infant weight gain and elevated maternal prepregnancy BMI each have strong associations with offspring risk for overweight and obesity. However, whether rapid weight gain interacts with maternal weight status to exacerbate childhood obesity risk has not been well studied.
Rapid weight gain amplified associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI and childhood body size and adiposity. Preventing rapid weight gain during early life, especially in the context of maternal obesity, may mitigate future risk of overweight and obesity.
Rapid infant weight gain (RWG) has strong associations with later risk for overweight and obesity.1–4 The degree of weight gain during infancy has a direct relationship to BMI in later childhood4,5 and adulthood.6 A meta-analysis of more than 47 000 individuals found that for every 1-unit increase in weight-for-age z score in the first year, risk of obesity in adulthood increased by almost 25%.6 We have recently shown that RWG may also increase susceptibility to hepatic fat accumulation and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,7 underscoring the clinical significance of RWG. Despite the known adverse health effects of RWG, pediatricians are often unfamiliar with the risks of excessive early weight gain compared with the well-recognized risks of inadequate weight gain.8 In addition, the American Academy of Pediatrics recognizes the contribution of RWG to obesity risk but gives no specific guidelines to primary care providers for its prevention, recognition, or mitigation.9
Maternal weight status during pregnancy further contributes to a child’s risk of obesity10,11 and several groups have included maternal prepregnancy BMI (ppBMI) in RWG prediction algorithms.1,6,12 However, whether infant RWG interacts with maternal weight status to augment risk for offspring obesity development has not been well studied. We hypothesized RWG would modify the association between ppBMI and childhood anthropometric outcomes such that joint exposure to maternal obesity and RWG would additively increase childhood obesity risk. We used an observational birth cohort to investigate associations between ppBMI, RWG, and their interaction, with markers of childhood body size (BMI-for-age z scores) and composition (percent fat mass [%FM] and fat-free mass index [FFMI]).
Methods
Healthy Start Study
This report used data from the Healthy Start Study, an ongoing, longitudinal, observational prebirth cohort study.13 From 2009 to 2014, 1410 pregnant individuals aged 16 years or older were enrolled before 24 weeks of gestation from obstetrics clinics at the University of Colorado Hospital in Denver, Colorado. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, history of serious chronic disease, or history of stillbirth or preterm birth before 25 weeks. In-person research visits occurred during pregnancy (median, 17 and 27 weeks), birth (median, 1 day old), infancy (median, 5 months old), and early childhood (median, 5 years old). Pregnant individuals provided written informed consent at enrollment. Children provided written assent starting at age 7 years. The study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board and is registered as an observational study at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02273297).
Participants were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis if all of the following measurements were available: weight at birth, infancy, and early childhood study visits; body composition in early childhood; infant primary feeding mode; and gestational age at birth (Supplemental Fig 4). Medical conditions were abstracted from electronic medical records and individually reviewed to exclude participants with conditions known to significantly impact growth and/or feeding. Participants with certain medical conditions were excluded, including 22q11.2 deletion (DiGeorge) syndrome, ichthyosis congenita, phenylketonuria, and others. We further excluded those with infancy visits before age 3 months or after 7 months. Differences between the entire Healthy Start cohort and the analytical sample are presented in Supplemental Table 5.
Maternal and Offspring Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition
Prepregnancy weight was obtained from medical record abstraction (91%) or from self-report at the first pregnancy visit (9%). Maternal height was measured using a stadiometer at the first pregnancy research visit. The ppBMI was calculated as prepregnancy weight (kilograms) divided by height (meters) squared. Gestational weight gain was calculated using prepregnancy weight and the last clinically measured weight during pregnancy and compared with Institute of Medicine guidelines.
For offspring, recumbent length (birth and infancy visits) or standing height (early childhood visit) were measured with a stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm. Weight was measured on an electronic scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. We calculated birth weight-for-gestational age z scores and categorized participants as small for gestational age (SGA) if birth weight was <10th percentile based on reference data.14 Rapid weight gain (RWG) during infancy was defined as an increase in weight-for-age z score of ≥0.67 from the birth to infancy visit (average age, 4.8 months) because this cutoff has been previously correlated with increased risk for childhood obesity.6,15 BMI z scores at the early childhood visit (average age, 4.7 years) were determined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts. Child body composition was measured using air displacement plethysmography (BOD POD, COSMED, Inc.) as previously described13,16 to assess fat mass and fat-free mass. The %FM was calculated as fat mass divided by total mass.13 To examine whether ppBMI or RWG were associated with differences in early childhood fat free (lean) mass, we used FFMI, defined as fat-free mass in kilograms divided by height (meters) squared. We chose to use FFMI rather than total lean mass to avoid confounding from known correlations between fat-free mass and height.17,18
Covariates
Child sex, race, and ethnicity were determined by maternal report at the birth visit. Mode of delivery was assessed by medical record abstraction and categorized as vaginal, vaginal with forceps or vacuum, or cesarean section. Infant feeding practices, including breastfeeding and introduction of complementary solid foods, were collected by maternal self-report at the infancy visit. Child caloric (energy) intake was measured in early childhood using two 24-hour dietary recalls (1 weekday and 1 weekend day) with parents acting as proxy reporters for their children. Dietary recalls were facilitated by trained personnel from the University of North Carolina using the Nutrition Data System for Research software.19 Although there are known limitations to 24-hour recall data,20 previous work showed relative precision compared with other measures of energy intake.21,22 Dietary data were processed to obtain daily caloric intake in childhood.
Statistical Analysis
All analyses were performed in the Statistical Analysis Software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Population characteristics were assessed using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and means and SDs for continuous variables. Characteristics were compared between children with and without rapid weight gain using χ2 tests for categorical variables and Satterthwaite t tests for continuous variables.
For each outcome, 3 general linear regression models were fit to characterize associations between ppBMI, RWG, and their interaction, and the outcomes of BMI-for-age z score, %FM, and FFMI. All hypothesis tests, including tests of interaction, were conducted using the Wald test and an α level of 0.05. Model assumptions, including linearity, were assessed by plotting jackknifed studentized residuals by predictors. Model 1 had ppBMI as the major predictor of interest. Model 2 had RWG as the major predictor of interest. Model 3 had ppBMI, RWG, and the interaction between ppBMI and RWG as the major predictors of interest.
Additional covariates included infant sex, SGA (yes or no), and the 2-, 3-, or 4-way interactions between the major predictors, sex, and an indicator variable for SGA. Child’s age at the early childhood visit was included in models of %FM and FFMI, but not in models of BMI z score, which already accounts for age. If sex significantly modified the association between the major predictors and outcome, the model was stratified by sex. Interactions and the precision covariates, age at introduction of complementary foods, and mode of delivery were removed if nonsignificant. β estimates, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and figures of model predicted means were reported for each final and best-fitting model.
Two additional analyses were conducted using each best-fitting model (models 1–3) to determine if either breastfeeding or childhood caloric intake explained part of the association. Best-fitting models were adjusted for either exclusive breastfeeding (yes or no) at the time of the infancy visit or average childhood caloric intake per day. Hypothesis tests were then reassessed to determine if model inference remained the same. A directed acyclic graph is shown in Supplemental Fig 5.
Poisson regression was conducted to assess the relative risk of overweight or obesity among children who were exposed to rapid weight gain. The outcome was overweight or obesity (yes or no). The predictors were RWG, sex, and SGA. Relative risk and 95% CIs were reported.
Results
A total of 414 subjects were included in this analysis. Of those, 77 (18.6%) experienced RWG (increase in weight-for-age z score of ≥0.67 from birth visit to infancy visit) and 337 did not (Table 1). Infants who experienced RWG were on average smaller at birth (2.8 kg vs 3.2 kg), born 1 week earlier (38.7 vs 39.7 weeks) and were more likely to be SGA (33.8% vs 13.1%). RWG and normal weight gain groups did not differ in any other characteristic including maternal ppBMI, excessive gestational weight gain, race, ethnicity, infant sex, delivery mode, or primary feeding mode. There was no association between ppBMI and RWG in this cohort (P = .79), similar to findings of others.23–25
Characteristics of Study Participants, According to Infant RWG Status
. | Rapid Weight Gain, n =77 . | Normal Weight Gain, n = 337 . | P* . |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal characteristics | |||
Prepregnancy BMI, mean (SD) | 26.2 (5.5) | 26.2 (6.6) | .92 |
Maternal overweight/obesity, n (%) | 39 (50.7) | 167 (49.6) | .86 |
Excessive gestational weight gain by IOM guidelines, n (%) | 26 (33.8) | 104 (30.9) | .81 |
Female, n (%) | 40 (52.0) | 167 (49.6) | .70 |
Race, n (%) | |||
White | 62 (81) | 285 (85) | .61** |
Black | 11 (14) | 31 (9) | |
Asian | 2 (3) | 6 (2) | |
Native American/Alaska Native | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | |
More than 1 race | 2 (3) | 13 (4) | |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |||
Hispanic | 26 (34) | 78 (23) | .053 |
Not Hispanic | 51 (66) | 259 (77) | |
Household income, $, n (%) | |||
<40 000 | 19 (25) | 78 (23) | .43 |
40 000–70 000 | 18 (23) | 62 (18) | |
>70 000 | 26 (34) | 147 (44) | |
Did not report | 14 (18) | 50 (15) | |
Maternal education, n (%) | |||
<High school | 11 (14) | 36 (11) | .66 |
High school | 8 (10) | 47 (14) | |
Some college or associate degree | 21 (27) | 75 (22) | |
Bachelor’s degree | 19 (25) | 86 (26) | |
Graduate degree | 18 (23) | 93 (28) | |
Mothers who smoked during pregnancy, n (%) | 2 (2.6) | 10 (3.0) | .86 |
Offspring characteristics | |||
Birth weight, kg | 2.8 (0.40) | 3.2 (0.40) | <.0001 |
Length at infant visit, cm | 64.2 (3.0) | 63.8 (2.7) | .31 |
Small for gestational age, n (%) | 26 (33.8) | 44 (13.1) | <.0001 |
Mode of delivery, n (%) | .19 | ||
Vaginal | 61 (79.2) | 254 (75.4) | |
Vaginal with forceps/vacuum | 1 (1.3) | 22 (6.5) | |
Cesarean section | 15 (19.5) | 61 (18.1) | |
Gestational age at birth, wk | 38.7 (1.6) | 39.7 (1.1) | <.0001 |
Primary infant feeding mode, n (%) | .91 | ||
Exclusively breastfed | 41 (53.3) | 175 (51.9) | |
Exclusively formula fed | 2 (2.6) | 12 (3.6) | |
Mix of breastmilk and formula | 34 (44.2) | 150 (44.5) | |
Breastmilk months, mean (SD) | 3.4 (1.9) | 3.7 (1.7) | .16 |
Age of solid complementary food, mean (SD) | 6.1 (1.6) | 5.9 (1.7) | .52 |
Child energy intake at 5 y, mean (SD) | 1456 (374) | 1410 (335) | .37 |
. | Rapid Weight Gain, n =77 . | Normal Weight Gain, n = 337 . | P* . |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal characteristics | |||
Prepregnancy BMI, mean (SD) | 26.2 (5.5) | 26.2 (6.6) | .92 |
Maternal overweight/obesity, n (%) | 39 (50.7) | 167 (49.6) | .86 |
Excessive gestational weight gain by IOM guidelines, n (%) | 26 (33.8) | 104 (30.9) | .81 |
Female, n (%) | 40 (52.0) | 167 (49.6) | .70 |
Race, n (%) | |||
White | 62 (81) | 285 (85) | .61** |
Black | 11 (14) | 31 (9) | |
Asian | 2 (3) | 6 (2) | |
Native American/Alaska Native | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | |
More than 1 race | 2 (3) | 13 (4) | |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |||
Hispanic | 26 (34) | 78 (23) | .053 |
Not Hispanic | 51 (66) | 259 (77) | |
Household income, $, n (%) | |||
<40 000 | 19 (25) | 78 (23) | .43 |
40 000–70 000 | 18 (23) | 62 (18) | |
>70 000 | 26 (34) | 147 (44) | |
Did not report | 14 (18) | 50 (15) | |
Maternal education, n (%) | |||
<High school | 11 (14) | 36 (11) | .66 |
High school | 8 (10) | 47 (14) | |
Some college or associate degree | 21 (27) | 75 (22) | |
Bachelor’s degree | 19 (25) | 86 (26) | |
Graduate degree | 18 (23) | 93 (28) | |
Mothers who smoked during pregnancy, n (%) | 2 (2.6) | 10 (3.0) | .86 |
Offspring characteristics | |||
Birth weight, kg | 2.8 (0.40) | 3.2 (0.40) | <.0001 |
Length at infant visit, cm | 64.2 (3.0) | 63.8 (2.7) | .31 |
Small for gestational age, n (%) | 26 (33.8) | 44 (13.1) | <.0001 |
Mode of delivery, n (%) | .19 | ||
Vaginal | 61 (79.2) | 254 (75.4) | |
Vaginal with forceps/vacuum | 1 (1.3) | 22 (6.5) | |
Cesarean section | 15 (19.5) | 61 (18.1) | |
Gestational age at birth, wk | 38.7 (1.6) | 39.7 (1.1) | <.0001 |
Primary infant feeding mode, n (%) | .91 | ||
Exclusively breastfed | 41 (53.3) | 175 (51.9) | |
Exclusively formula fed | 2 (2.6) | 12 (3.6) | |
Mix of breastmilk and formula | 34 (44.2) | 150 (44.5) | |
Breastmilk months, mean (SD) | 3.4 (1.9) | 3.7 (1.7) | .16 |
Age of solid complementary food, mean (SD) | 6.1 (1.6) | 5.9 (1.7) | .52 |
Child energy intake at 5 y, mean (SD) | 1456 (374) | 1410 (335) | .37 |
Number and percent of observations are reported for categorical variables and mean and SD are reported for continuous variables. IOM, Institute of Medicine.
P values were calculated using χ2 test for categorical variables and Satterthwaite t test for continuous variables.
P value was calculated using the Fisher exact test.
Early Childhood BMI z score
Maternal ppBMI and RWG were both positively associated with offspring BMI z score in childhood (Table 2). There was a 3-way interaction between ppBMI, RWG, and offspring sex (P = .0025), so results were stratified by sex. Among females, RWG significantly modified the association between ppBMI and early childhood BMI z scores (Fig 1A). For example, females exposed to a maternal ppBMI of 30 followed by RWG had 1.25 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.65) higher average BMI z scores in early childhood than those exposed to a ppBMI of 30 without RWG, and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.90) higher average BMI z scores compared with those exposed to maternal ppBMI of 23 and no RWG (Fig 1B). Among males, RWG did not significantly modify the association between ppBMI and early childhood BMI z scores (P = .73; Fig 1A). Additional adjustment for breastfeeding status or caloric intake in childhood did not substantially alter the findings (Supplemental Table 6). Children who experienced RWG were 1.84 (95% CI, 1.04 to 3.26) times more likely to develop overweight or obesity, when compared with children who did not experience RWG (P = .037).
Predicted change in BMI z scores for females based on maternal ppBMI and infant RWG. A, Marginal differences in male and female offspring with and without rapid weight gain. B, Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had a predicted BMI near the 50th percentile. Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had a predicted BMI at the 94th percentile.
Predicted change in BMI z scores for females based on maternal ppBMI and infant RWG. A, Marginal differences in male and female offspring with and without rapid weight gain. B, Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had a predicted BMI near the 50th percentile. Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had a predicted BMI at the 94th percentile.
Main and Joint Effects of Maternal ppBMI and RWG on Childhood BMI-for-Age z Score
Main Predictor . | Sex . | n . | β (95% CI)a . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal ppBMI | Both | 413 | 0.06 (0.04 to 0.07) | 50.71 | <.0001 |
Rapid infant wt gain | Both | 413 | 0.56 (0.28 to 0.84) | 15.38 | .0001 |
Interaction* | Males | 206 | 0.01 (–0.06 to 0.08) | 0.12 | .73 |
Females | 207 | 0.16 (0.10 to 0.22) | 27.29 | <.0001 |
Main Predictor . | Sex . | n . | β (95% CI)a . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal ppBMI | Both | 413 | 0.06 (0.04 to 0.07) | 50.71 | <.0001 |
Rapid infant wt gain | Both | 413 | 0.56 (0.28 to 0.84) | 15.38 | .0001 |
Interaction* | Males | 206 | 0.01 (–0.06 to 0.08) | 0.12 | .73 |
Females | 207 | 0.16 (0.10 to 0.22) | 27.29 | <.0001 |
CI, confidence interval.
β coefficients and 95% CIs are for associations of maternal ppBMI (+1 kg/m2), infant RWG (compared with normal infant weight gain), and their interaction with offspring BMI in early childhood (age 4–6 y). Models were adjusted for sex and small for gestational age (yes or no).
The interaction between ppBMI and rapid weight gain significantly differed by sex (P = .0025), so the model was stratified by sex.
Percent Fat Mass
We next tested the effect of maternal ppBMI and RWG on childhood %FM as measured by air displacement plethysmography. Maternal ppBMI and RWG in infancy were both positively associated with childhood %FM (Table 3). RWG appeared to modify the association between ppBMI and childhood %FM, although the interaction P value was just above the cut point for statistical significance (P = .056). For example, children exposed to a maternal ppBMI of 30 followed by RWG had 4.01% (95% CI, 2.00% to 6.02%) higher average %FM in early childhood than those exposed to a ppBMI of 30 without RWG, and 4.92% (95% CI, 2.93% to 6.91%) higher average %FM than children whose mothers had a ppBMI of 23 and normal weight gain in infancy (Fig 2). There was no interaction by child sex. Additional adjustment for breastfeeding status in infancy or caloric intake in childhood did not substantially alter the findings (Supplemental Table 7).
Predicted change in %FM in offspring based on maternal ppBMI and infant RWG. A, Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 18.37%. Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 23.29%. B, Male offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 18.23%. Male offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 23.16%.
Predicted change in %FM in offspring based on maternal ppBMI and infant RWG. A, Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 18.37%. Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 23.29%. B, Male offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 18.23%. Male offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had an average %FM of 23.16%.
Main and Joint Effects of Maternal ppBMI and RWG on Childhood Percent Fat Mass
Main Predictor . | n . | β (95% CI)a . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal ppBMI | 378 | 0.17 (0.07 to 0.27) | 11.13 | .0009 |
Rapid infant wt gain | 378 | 2.93 (1.23 to 4.62) | 11.56 | .0007 |
Interaction | 378 | 0.28 (–0.01 to 0.57) | 3.67 | .056 |
Main Predictor . | n . | β (95% CI)a . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal ppBMI | 378 | 0.17 (0.07 to 0.27) | 11.13 | .0009 |
Rapid infant wt gain | 378 | 2.93 (1.23 to 4.62) | 11.56 | .0007 |
Interaction | 378 | 0.28 (–0.01 to 0.57) | 3.67 | .056 |
CI, confidence interval.
β coefficients and 95% CIs are for associations of maternal ppBMI (+1 kg/m2), infant RWG (compared with normal infant weight gain), and their interaction with percent fat mass in early childhood (age 4–7 y). Models were adjusted for sex, small for gestational age (yes or no), and child’s age at the childhood visit.
Fat-Free Mass Index
As expected based on prior reports,18 BMI z score and total fat-free mass were positively correlated in this data set (both sexes: ρ = 0.47; females: ρ = 0.50; males: ρ = 0.43; all P < .0001) such that children with higher BMI z scores had more fat-free mass. Adjusting for height through FFMI (defined as fat-free mass [kg] divided by height [m2]) can make this association less pronounced.17 Although maternal ppBMI was positively associated with offspring FFMI, RWG was not (Table 4). There was a 3-way interaction between ppBMI, RWG, and offspring sex (P = .0073), so results were stratified by sex. RWG significantly modified the association between ppBMI and FFMI among females but not males (Fig 3A). For example, females exposed to a maternal ppBMI of 30 followed by RWG had a 0.93 kg/m2 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.43) higher average FFMI in early childhood than females exposed to a ppBMI of 30 without RWG, and 1.15 kg/m2 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65) higher average FFMI compared with those exposed to maternal ppBMI of 23 and no RWG (Fig 3B). Additional adjustment for breastfeeding status in infancy or caloric intake in childhood did not substantially alter the findings (Supplemental Table 8).
Differences in FFMI in female offspring based on maternal ppBMI and infant RWG. A, Marginal differences in male and female offspring with and without rapid weight gain. B, Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had an average FFMI of 12.38 kg/m2. Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had an average FFMI of 13.53 kg/m2.
Differences in FFMI in female offspring based on maternal ppBMI and infant RWG. A, Marginal differences in male and female offspring with and without rapid weight gain. B, Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 23 and no rapid weight gain had an average FFMI of 12.38 kg/m2. Female offspring with a maternal ppBMI of 30 plus rapid weight gain had an average FFMI of 13.53 kg/m2.
Main and Joint Effects of Maternal ppBMI and RWG on Fat-Free Mass Index (kg/m2)
Main Predictor . | Sex . | n . | β (95% CI)a . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal ppBMI | Both | 378 | 0.040 (0.020 to 0.059) | 16.09 | <.0001 |
Rapid infant wt gain | Both | 378 | 0.23 (–0.11 to 0.57) | 1.77 | .18 |
Interaction* | Males | 188 | −0.009 (–0.098 to 0.080) | 0.04 | .84 |
Females | 190 | 0.17 (0.093 to 0.24) | 19.93 | <.0001 |
Main Predictor . | Sex . | n . | β (95% CI)a . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal ppBMI | Both | 378 | 0.040 (0.020 to 0.059) | 16.09 | <.0001 |
Rapid infant wt gain | Both | 378 | 0.23 (–0.11 to 0.57) | 1.77 | .18 |
Interaction* | Males | 188 | −0.009 (–0.098 to 0.080) | 0.04 | .84 |
Females | 190 | 0.17 (0.093 to 0.24) | 19.93 | <.0001 |
CI, confidence interval.
β coefficients and 95% CIs are for associations of maternal ppBMI (+1 kg/m2), infant RWG (compared with normal infant weight gain), and their interaction with offspring fat free mass index in early childhood (age 4–6 y). Models were adjusted for sex, small for gestational age (yes or no), and child’s age at the childhood visit.
The interaction between ppBMI and rapid weight gain significantly differed by sex (P = .0073), so the model was stratified by sex.
Discussion
In this study, we show that maternal ppBMI and RWG in infants interact to produce higher early childhood BMI z scores in a sexually dimorphic manner. Females whose mothers had a ppBMI of 23 and normal infancy weight gain had an average BMI at the 51st percentile, whereas females whose mothers had a ppBMI of 30 followed by RWG in infancy had an average BMI at the 94th percentile in early childhood, nearly at the cutoff for classification of obesity. Our results also demonstrate independent significant effects of ppBMI and of RWG on childhood %FM, as well as potentially an interactive effect, highlighting the importance of body composition end points to more fully characterize long-term effects of early life exposures. Development of childhood obesity is multifactorial and involves both biological and socioecological inputs, including contributions from pre- and postnatal environments. Although many studies have investigated the individual effects of pre- and postnatal factors, few have examined their interactive effects.
Several other groups have shown separate correlations of both maternal obesity11 and RWG26,27 with later risk of increased adiposity. Our results show that each of these exposures is associated with %FM in childhood and suggest possible combined effects of RWG and maternal ppBMI on offspring %FM. A similar interaction between maternal obesity during pregnancy and RWG was previously described.23 RWG was defined from birth to the second birthday; triceps skin fold measurements were used to estimate fat mass annually from age 2 to 6 years. The authors concluded that maternal obesity influenced that rate of change in %FM from 2 to 6 years of age among children with RWG but did not specifically assess differences in adiposity at the study’s conclusion. In both their study and ours, children were studied during the physiologic BMI nadir and adiposity rebound,28 which may make detection of %FM differences more challenging.
Our findings suggest that maternal ppBMI and RWG are each risk factors for childhood adiposity, regardless of sex, and may have interactive effects. The age range of our early childhood body composition measurements at 4 to 6 years corresponds to the physiologic nadir of adiposity and before the BMI and adiposity rebounds.29 Studies at older ages may clarify whether there is truly an interactive effect on %FM. For FFMI, we found a significant synergistic effect of maternal ppBMI and RWG in females only. Because fat-free (lean) mass is a major component of and correlates with BMI in childhood,18 the combined effects of maternal ppBMI and RWG on FFMI may reflect their joint effects on childhood BMI.
Although most studies have likewise found that early RWG promotes a higher BMI later in life,4,26,30 the effect of RWG may depend on additional exposures or characteristics. In our study, female children were particularly affected by the combined effects of ppBMI and RWG, possibly a reflection of earlier adiposity rebound in females28 or hormonal differences during the minipuberty of infancy.31 Others have looked for sex differences in the response to early RWG, although results varied from ours. One study noted a stronger effect in males32 although many, including a meta-analysis,6 found no evidence of sex dimorphism.26 The scarcity of previous publications reporting on the interaction of maternal ppBMI and RWG makes us unable to make definitive conclusions about sex differences. We recommend that pediatric providers monitor infants of both sexes for RWG. Additional studies adequately powered to detect sex differences and examination of time points into adolescence and adulthood may provide a more complete picture of sexual dimorphism related to RWG.
Previous reports have also demonstrated anthropometric outcome differences related to RWG based on race and/or ethnicity,33 whether the child was primarily breast or formula fed,34,35 and cigarette smoke exposure.12,23 The influence of socioeconomic status may differ between study populations.1,33 Our results appear to be independent of primary infant feeding mode, but examinations of race and ethnicity or socioeconomic status may be incorporated in future analyses. More work is needed in larger cohorts to clarify the contributions of each factor.
Our study focused on the combined effects of elevated maternal ppBMI and RWG, regardless of the underlying cause of RWG. Others have investigated various contributors to RWG, including duration of breastfeeding,36 formula feeding,35,37 timing of introduction of complementary foods,38,39 infant food responsiveness and eating speed,40 and feeding on a schedule.37 In this cohort, breastfeeding rates and timing of complementary introduction did not differ between infants with and without RWG, and adjustment for breastfeeding status at 6 months of age did not significantly change the findings. Similarly, adjustment for caloric intake in childhood did not significantly alter the magnitude of associations between ppBMI, RWG, and offspring outcomes. In the current study, we did not examine specific aspects of childhood dietary intake such as consumption of added sugar41 or physical activity levels.42 We did not consider possible interventions for prevention of RWG. Recent studies showed lower risk of RWG with promotion of responsive feeding practices.43–45 Ongoing studies are testing whether increased paternal engagement prevents RWG46 and the impact of sleep and the intestinal microbiome.47
Although the present report has many strengths, there are some limitations. Our relatively small analytic sample size benefited from location in a high resource area with a high national prevalence of overweight and obesity.48 Our results may not be generalizable to a more global setting. Others have remarked that prevention of RWG may only be appropriate in communities with a high percentage of childhood overweight/obesity and a low percentage of underweight children.6 It is thus possible that RWG may benefit children in low-resource settings, particularly those born small, with previous evidence that RWG improves human capital.49 Additional populations that may benefit from accelerated postnatal growth are infants born prematurely,50 who were excluded from this analysis, and infants born SGA27 because modest catch-up growth in early infancy may be a normal physiologic process for SGA infants.51,52 Specific studies focused on these unique populations are warranted to define ideal postnatal growth patterns.
Our inclusion of body composition by air displacement plethysmography more clearly connects RWG to increased adiposity than use of BMI alone, although 2-compartment body composition models do not allow for characterization of fat mass distribution. We and others have shown that RWG may increase visceral53 and hepatic7 fat accumulation in childhood and visceral fat in mid-adulthood.54 Higher visceral fat has been previously linked to higher adult mortality55 and may be an important outcome for future work. Incorporation of body composition in the newborn period may more precisely identify infant risk factors.13,56 However, because body composition is not routinely available in the clinical setting, our use of weight-for-age z scores offers better practical guidance for pediatric providers. Finally, pursuing follow-up into adulthood will shed additional clarity on the long-term ramifications of RWG during infancy.
Conclusions
There is synergistic interaction between RWG in infancy and maternal prepregnancy weight status in relation to childhood BMI and body composition. Identifying modifiable factors contributing to RWG will be crucial to develop effective interventions. Pediatric providers should monitor infants for RWG during early life, especially in the context of maternal obesity, to mitigate future risk of overweight and obesity.
Dr Gilley conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted data, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Ms Harrall conceptualized and designed the study, carried out statistical analyses, analyzed and interpreted data, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Ms Friedman performed, and Dr Glueck supervised statistical analyses, and both reviewed and revised the manuscript; Drs Sauder, Cohen, Perng, and Krebs conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted data, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; Drs Shankar and Dabelea conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data analysis and interpretation, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.
This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02273297).
Deidentified individual participant data (including data dictionaries) can be made available, in addition to study protocols, the statistical analysis plan, and the informed consent form. The data can be made available on publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be submitted to healthy.start@ucdenver.edu.
FUNDING: This work was funded by NIH grants R01DK076648 and UH3OD023248 to Dr Dabelea, and NIH grant R01GM121081 to Dr Glueck. Additional support was provided by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA grant UL1 TR002535 and NIDDK grant P30-DK056350 to the University of North Carolina Nutrition Obesity Research Center. Drs Gilley and Cohen were supported by NIDDK grant T32-DK007658. Dr Cohen is supported by NIDDK grant F32DK131757. Dr Perng is supported by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA grant KL2 TR002534. The funder/sponsor did not participate in the work. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comments
Letter to the Editor: Reply to Johnson
First, there are certainly larger cohort studies in which to ask questions about maternal body size, early-life growth, and future obesity – including the Millennium Cohort Study. However, these large studies frequently rely on self-reported maternal pre-pregnancy BMI which is subject to bias (1). Larger studies may also lack directly-assessed body composition, a main outcome of interest and major strength of our study. We point out that with n=414, we were able to detect significant and biologically relevant differences in adiposity among children who experienced rapid infant weight gain vs. those who did not.
Second, the stronger associations observed among children of women with higher pre-pregnancy BMI may reflect that maternal adiposity and rapid infant growth operate jointly to promote child adiposity. For example, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI may influence offspring adiposity through in utero programming of adipogenic potential (2), whereas rapid infant growth may result from early-life microbiota composition (3) among other factors. The possibility of distinct pathways gives rise to a biological interaction and provides the impetus for the study at hand.
Third, our interest in sex differences is based on literature demonstrating differences in obesity-related outcomes following in utero exposure to developmental overnutrition for males vs. females (4). We used a data-driven approach by first testing for a statistical interaction and then conducting sex-stratified analyses where appropriate. While the model of % fat mass was not stratified by sex, we presented sex-specific estimates in Figure 2 of the original manuscript.
Fourth, Dr. Johnson inquired on criteria for statistical significance and scales for each outcome. We agree that p-values are arbitrary, but we remained true to the alpha-level selected for significance prior to modeling to avoid false positive findings. Regarding outcome scales, we assessed age- and sex-specific offspring BMI z-score as it is an internationally accepted proxy for excess adiposity (5) and kept body composition in their native units for interpretability as there are currently no established thresholds or external references.
Fifth, regarding concern about inclusion of mediators as covariates, we agree that small for gestational age (SGA) may be a mediator, but we chose to include it given the importance of birth size to infant growth, which Dr. Johnson acknowledges in the comment. Even with SGA in the model, we still observed significant associations.
Finally, there are multiple approaches for defining rapid infant weight gain. We selected >+0.67 z-scores as this cutoff is widely used in the literature, thereby allowing for comparison of our findings to previous studies. Further, pediatric medical providers are familiar with z-scores, facilitating easy identification of rapid infant weight gain in a clinical setting. We chose to not focus exclusively on “extreme cases” of rapid infant weight gain as this may exclude some children with increased risk of obesity and further limit our sample size. We did not study linear growth in the present study, but agree it is an interesting area for future research.
REFERENCES
1. Natamba BK, Sanchez SE, Gelaye B, and Williams MA. Concordance between self-reported pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and BMI measured at the first prenatal study contact. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16: 187, 2016.
2. Boyle KE, Patinkin ZW, Shapiro AL, Baker PR, 2nd, Dabelea D, and Friedman JE. Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Infants Born to Obese Mothers Exhibit Greater Potential for Adipogenesis: The Healthy Start BabyBUMP Project. Diabetes 65: 647-659, 2016.
3. Alderete TL, Jones RB, Shaffer JP, Holzhausen EA, Patterson WB, Kazemian E, Chatzi L, Knight R, Plows JF, Berger PK, and Goran MI. Early life gut microbiota is associated with rapid infant growth in Hispanics from Southern California. Gut Microbes 13: 1961203, 2021.
4. Regnault N, Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Eggleston E, and Oken E. Sex-specific associations of gestational glucose tolerance with childhood body composition. Diabetes Care 36: 3045-3053, 2013.
5. Cole TJ, Faith MS, Pietrobelli A, and Heo M. What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children: BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile? Eur J Clin Nutr 59: 419-425, 2005.
Rapid infant weight gain: Critique of the Gilley et al paper and thoughts on how to move the field forward
One must question the use of the Healthy Start Study for this research. The sample size is 414 and only 77 infants had RWG. These numbers can be halved for sex-stratified analyses. Despite these low numbers, the aim was to examine whether the associations of RWG with child body size/composition differ according to maternal ppBMI. The problem is that the numbers are not anywhere near large enough to compare how the associations differ between women with ppBMI at different points of the distribution (e.g., 30 vs 23 kg/m2). A model will provide estimates, but whether they can be trusted is questionable. Other studies have similar variables in samples that are at least 10-fold larger (e.g., Millennium Cohort Study [1,2]), and it would be good to address the same research question using those data.
The paper includes no theory as to why the associations might be stronger at higher levels of ppBMI. This was the stated hypothesis and what was observed in girls for child BMI (z-score) and FFMI (kg/m^2). Like the authors, I have no explanation why the interaction estimates for child BMI and FFMI were so different in boys than girls. For %FM, estimates are only shown for sexes combined. The interaction estimate was 0.28 (–0.01 to 0.57); it is a shame that this finding is largely dismissed because p 0.056 > 0.05. In the discussion, the authors write: “studies at older ages may clarify whether there is truly an interactive effect on %FM” because the adiposity rebound “may make detection of %FM differences more challenging”. I do not agree with this reasoning, particularly given that the study found strong relationships of RWG and ppBMI with %FM. Unfortunately, the use of different outcome scales (i.e., z-score, kg/m^2, %) and a mixture of sex-stratified vs sex-specific results makes comparison (e.g., between outcomes) challenging. Adjustment of the models for mediators is also potentially problematic [3].
The association of RWG with child BMI is self-fulfilling in the sense that it partly reflects tracking of weight (e.g., between 5 months and 5 years). The authors defined RWG as a change in infant weight > +0.67 Z-scores (equivalent to one centile band on UK but not USA charts) because “this cut-off has been previously correlated with increased risk for childhood obesity”. But if they had used a higher cut-off (e.g., > +1.34 Z-scores) they would have found stronger associations of RWG with the outcomes [1]. The use of > +0.67 Z-scores is common practice, but this cut-off is arbitrary and does not identity extreme cases. We have long known that growth assortment occurs following birth, with many infants shifting up one centile band on a growth chart [4]. Perhaps what is more important is whether linear growth also follows the same pattern. The highest BMI values and obesity risk will occur in infants with RWG whose length does not also increase by > +0.67 Z-scores. Appropriate consideration of birth size is also important given some evidence that foetal growth modifies the relationship of RWG with child adiposity.[5]
REFERENCES
1. Johnson W, Bann D, Hardy R. Infant weight gain and adolescent body mass index: comparison across two British cohorts born in 1946 and 2001. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103(10):974-80.
2. Johnson W, Norris T, De Freitas R, Pearson N, Hamer M, Costa S. Is the positive relationship of infant weight gain with adolescent adiposity attenuated by moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in childhood? Int J Obes. 2021;45(1):84-94.
3. Groenwold RHH, Palmer TM, Tilling K. To Adjust or Not to Adjust? When a "Confounder" Is Only Measured After Exposure. Epidemiology. 2021;32(2):194-201.
4. Cameron N. 2021. The pattern of human growth. In Cameron N, Schell L (eds), Human growth and development, 3rd Edition (pages 1-22). Elsevier; London, UK.
5. Ong YY, Sadananthan SA, Aris IM, et al. Mismatch between poor fetal growth and rapid postnatal weight gain in the first 2 years of life is associated with higher blood pressure and insulin resistance without increased adiposity in childhood: the GUSTO cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(5):1591-1603.