Skip to Main Content
TABLE 1

Dos and Don’ts of Peer Review

DoDon’t
Check your biases Agree to review a manuscript if you cannot be objective 
Note glaring omissions in citations, such as foundational studies or recent advances Request that the authors cite a paper on which you are an author (self-citation) 
Critique the manuscript Criticize the authors 
Provide constructive, specific critiques Provide general comments without evidence 
Acknowledge if there are parts of the manuscript that you do not feel qualified to review Ignore methods or statistics with which you are unfamiliar 
Recommend specific, addressable changes to analysis or interpretation Recommend extensive additional study beyond the scope of the work described 
Evaluate organization, flow, and readability Copy edit the manuscript 
Use comments to the editor to note if major grammatical errors make the manuscript difficult to read Suggest editing by a “native English speaker” or otherwise directly impugn the authors’ language skill 
DoDon’t
Check your biases Agree to review a manuscript if you cannot be objective 
Note glaring omissions in citations, such as foundational studies or recent advances Request that the authors cite a paper on which you are an author (self-citation) 
Critique the manuscript Criticize the authors 
Provide constructive, specific critiques Provide general comments without evidence 
Acknowledge if there are parts of the manuscript that you do not feel qualified to review Ignore methods or statistics with which you are unfamiliar 
Recommend specific, addressable changes to analysis or interpretation Recommend extensive additional study beyond the scope of the work described 
Evaluate organization, flow, and readability Copy edit the manuscript 
Use comments to the editor to note if major grammatical errors make the manuscript difficult to read Suggest editing by a “native English speaker” or otherwise directly impugn the authors’ language skill 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal